EUROSPHERE Final Reports
The EUROSPHERE Consortium has concluded its work and submitted their final reports to the European Commision. In the previous periods, we produced 16 single country case studies, 12 comparative reports, 40 working papers, 45 research notes, 1 book, and articles in international journals. Most of these are available in this website. Our work in 2012 targeted publishing our findings and perspectives more extensively in international academic channels. However, we also did new research and produced two comprehensive reports to disseminate our new findings, in addition to the project’s final report summarizing the project’s five-year long activities in sixteen European countries. Our final comparative studies and the project’s final report can be downloaded here:
Hakan G. Sicakkan (ed.) (2013): Linking the European Union with the Citizens. Evaluation of the EU’s Policies Aiming to Create a Democratic European Public Sphere. EUROSPHERE Final Comparative Study, Vol.1.
Peter A. Kraus and Giuseppe Sciortino (eds.) (2013): Linking the European Union with the Citizens. Evaluation of the EU’s Diversity Policies Aiming to Create an Inclusive European Public Sphere. EUROSPHERE Final Comparative Study, Vol.2.
EUROSPHERE Knowledgebase is Now Open to Public
The EUROSPHERE Knowledgebase was opened to the public on the 15th of December 2012. The EUROSPHERE Knowledgebase aims to present data that link the views of both the key and marginalized participants of national and European level public debates on the future of the European Union and the nation state, diversity of different kinds, and trans-European communication and collaboration. In addition to perception and attitude data, the knowledgebase also offers solid comprehensive data about the collaboration networks / patterns and goals of these organizations and elites, including both national and European networks, which allows comparisons of how different kinds of collaboration and networking affect the action repertoires and views of the participants in public debates at different levels. The data material also allows a snapshot analysis of the structure of the European public sphere, defined in terms of (1) horizontal and vertical collaboration and communication across borders and levels and (2) the extent to which the views expressed in different settings and levels constitute a system of competing discourses at the European level. The database contains the following data from 16 countries:
- Institutional data about the organizational features, objectives, and European networks of 48 national newspapers and 32 national public and commercial TV channels
- Institutional data about the organizational features, objectives, and European networks of more than 250 political parties, civil society organizations, and think tanks
- Quantified data from elite interviews with more than 750 persons who are leaders of or in leading positions in the above-mentioned types of organizations
- Media content data that comprises more than 8,000 print and broadcast news and more than 12,000 nstitutions and persons (sources) that are quoted in these news items
The data was collected during 2008 and the first two months of 2009 in fourteen EU member countries and in Norway and Turkey. The datamaterial, its documentation, codebooks as well as reports from single-country studies and comparative studies that are based on these data can be accessed in the EUROSPHERE Knowledgebase, which has been devised and presented by the Norwegian Social Science Data Services.
EUROSPHERE Final Conference Successfully Concluded
The EUROSPHERE final conference (Brussels on 22 June 2012) brought together the representatives of key European research milieus, the European Parliament, the European Commission, other EU-institutions, the European networks of civil society and policy-research organizations, media, and Eurosphere researchers in order to discuss the contributions of EUROSPHERE to the study of European public sphere (EPS) and European integration, current problems associated with European integration policies, and the thematic priorities needed for future research in the field. The conference comprised four subsequent sections:
09.15-13.45: New Notions? New Conceptual Frames? Discoveries about the EPS’s Structure, Substance and Dynamics?
13.45-15.00: Transition from Liberal Democracy in Hungary and the EPS. Challenges for European Democracy?
15.15-16.30: The EPS from the Perspectives of Diversity and Transnationalism. New Directions for Future Research?
16.45-18.30: What Citizens Want? What Civil Society Organizations and the EU do? New Forms of Democratic Legitimacy?
Mainstream approaches conceive the European public sphere as Europeanization of national public spheres, discursive and interactive overlaps/resonances between them, and in terms of how legitimate foreign-European speakers are considered in national public spaces. Differently from this, we find that the European public sphere is constituted by encounters between the existing public spaces, and it is distinguished by the presence of a parallel trans-European public space, and a parallel trans-European public, within the repertoire of existing publics and public spaces. This includes both the society-initiated and the EU-initiated trans-European publics and the new spaces of communication, interaction, and collective action that they create. Against this background, the theme of EUROSPHERE’s final conference is the tension between the EU-initiated and the society-initiated processes and actors of European integration. The focus is on the implications of this tension for the future structuring of the European public sphere and its consequences for democracy. Since the early 1990s, the EU has been attempting to initiate a trans-European civil society. Many institutional actors that are involved in society-initiated European transnational structures express skepticism about these top-down integration attempts of the EU. What are the consequences of this duality for the evolvement of a European public sphere? Why are many civil society organizations skeptical towards being involved in the EU-initiated trans-European networks and structures? And why are they hesitant towards coming into direct contact with the European Union’s political institutions? To what extent have the European Union’s policies on involving the society, civil dialogue, and communication been effective in bringing the EU closer to citizens? Have these policies created new legitimacies? If so, what are the consequences of the new legitimacies for European diversity and democracy? Which strategy – horizontal or vertical integration – is more capable of creating effective communication links and accountability frames between citizens and the EU?
During the conference, the leaders of the different research groups in EUROSPHERE presented their final results, and they received comments on their findings from external European researchers and representatives of the European Parliament, European Commission’s various DGs, a range of other EU institutions, political parties, civil society organizations, and media. For information information about the conference content and participants, please go to the conference webpage.
EUROSPHERE Comparative Reports Published
The project has now published the results of the its comparative studies of different aspects of European public spheres. This is done with an empirical focus on the perceptions, views, discourses, and networking patterns – in both national and transnational arenas - of the most central and visible institutional participants in public debates in sixteen European countries. The comparisons focus on the topical debates about diversity (including gender, migration, native and immigrant minorities), the future of the European polity (including enlargement, power relations between the EU and member states, and different policy areas), and expectations about the emerging European public sphere. Further, EUROSPHERE also assessed the role of national media and individual citizens in the articulation of European public spheres along the aforementioned lines. All EUROSPHERE comparative studies are downloadable free of charge. Go to comparative reports
The final Eurosphere PhD Summer Course was hosted by Sabanci University in Istanbul between 18-23 July 2011. The theme of the course “Is public sphere exclusively a nation-state phenomenon, or is it possible to observe transnational public spheres?” attracted interest from nearly all regions of the world. There were more than 100 applicants, but only 35 students could be admitted.
The lecturers were some Eurosphere Consortium members (Andras Bozoki, Wanda Dressler, Gürcan Kocan, Trond Kvamme, Yngve Lithman, Ahmet Öncü, Hakan G. Sicakkan) as well as internationally recognized scholars of public sphere (Jostein Gripsrud, Slavko Splichal, Geoff Bove). The students who attended the PhD summer course received 5 ECTS credits if they were present during the whole duration of the summer course and at the same time took on responsibility as active discussants in sessions; and 10 credits if they also submitted an essay to be evaluated by the EUROSPHERE Consortium. Go to Eurosphere Summer School
The 2010 EUROSPHERE Mid-term Conference
The EUROSPHERE mid-term conference “The Publics of Europe & the European Public Sphere: Tracing the Architects and Trespassers of Borders and Boundaries in Europe” was organised by the EUROSPHERE Consortium in Brussels on 11-12 November 2010. European researchers and a wide range of stakeholders, including European civil servants, civil society organizations and other European projects, reflected upon the EUROSPHERE mid-term findings. The discussions covered both normative and methodological issues in public spheres research.
By focusing on their role in the articulation of a European public sphere(s), the conference dealt with several types of national and European level social and political actors, including think tanks, political parties, social movements and NGOs and media. Empirical findings presented by EUROSPHERE researchers revealed instances of European communication; however these were restricted to certain areas and actors. For example, although citizens’ initiatives are organized around European NGO networks at the EU level, these networks often encounter difficulties in connecting with local NGOs. And despite think tanks’ (or policy research institutions) involvement in decision-making processes, they proved to be detached from the most immediate concerns of the general public. Thus EUROSPHERE findings indicate that rather than articulating society’s common good, think tanks tend to contribute to the elite/mass divide in Europe.
Workpackage 8 initiated
EUROSPHERE has launched the workpackage (WP8) containing the Consortium’s research activities in the final project period. In the previous research phase,EUROSPHERE has focused on the role of the citizens (WP4), social and political actors (WP5), communicative spaces (WP6) and gender spaces (WP7) in articulation of European public sphere (EPS). WP8 examines the attempts of the EU institutions in creating direct links with EU citizens and evaluates EU policies towards diversity and the European demos. In this respect, WP8 is connected to and complements the qualitative-comparative analyses conducted within the scope of WP4-7. When it comes to the EU institutions’ attempts to create direct links with the citizens, WP8 concentrates on the EU’s communication and media policies, publicconsultation system, the corporate-plural system and, finally, the formation of party groups within the European Parliament. Concerning the EU Policies about diversity and European demos, WP8 looks at the impact of EU policies on different aspects of diversity, such as gender, immigration-related, linguistic, regional-territorial and religious diversities.
As a component of WP8, in its final year, the Consortium will also synthesize the overall research findings of project. The final report draws particular attention to the potential alignments and misalignments between the sub-European communicative public spaces, (as represented by the social and political actors within them) and the potential European public sphere models. At the end of WP8, EUROSPHERE Consortium will also finalize the EUROSPHERE Knowledgebase which will entail a systemized presentation of the EUROSPHERE data and publishable results of the EUROSPHERE project (which are already accessible via the EUROSPHERE web-side), including the EUROSPHERE country reports, research reports, online working papers and research notes. The Knowledgebase will also entail links to other relevant data sources and publications.